Breaking
191 Murders, 190 of Them Children: Kenya Cult Leader Paul Mackenzie Convicted✦17.8% of UC Freshmen Fail Intro Math, Double the Rate Since SAT Was Dropped✦€32 Million a Year: Spain Quadruples Union Subsidies as Membership Hits Record Low✦32% Fewer Irregular EU Crossings as Central Mediterranean Collapses✦€1.13 Million in Ministry Grants, Then the CEO Role: Germany's Revolving Door✦Italy: Boy of 13 Sets Sleeping Man Alight and Cannot Be Prosecuted✦191 Murders, 190 of Them Children: Kenya Cult Leader Paul Mackenzie Convicted✦17.8% of UC Freshmen Fail Intro Math, Double the Rate Since SAT Was Dropped✦€32 Million a Year: Spain Quadruples Union Subsidies as Membership Hits Record Low✦32% Fewer Irregular EU Crossings as Central Mediterranean Collapses✦€1.13 Million in Ministry Grants, Then the CEO Role: Germany's Revolving Door✦Italy: Boy of 13 Sets Sleeping Man Alight and Cannot Be Prosecuted✦
Wednesday, 21 October 2026Est. 2026

FRISIAN NEWS

The numbers behind the news

English · Frysk · Nederlands

Why Tidally Driven Energy Never Took Off
Environment

Why Tidally Driven Energy Never Took Off

September 30, 2025 · Frisian News

Tidal power promised reliable renewable energy, but engineering costs, marine damage, and grid problems killed the technology before it scaled. Investors moved to wind and solar instead.

English

In 2010, the Rance tidal plant in Brittany generated electricity so reliably that engineers across northern Europe believed tidal barrages would become a significant energy source. The water moved twice daily, on schedule, with none of the wind's unpredictability. Fish biologists issued warnings that nobody read. Today, that plant sits as a rare operational tidal barrage in Europe, a museum piece.

The engineering failed to keep pace with the promise. Building barrages strong enough to handle salt water and mud required concrete and steel costs that climbed faster than solar panels fell. A single barrage could take ten years to permit and build. Developers watched as wind turbine costs fell sharply in the same period. The math broke. Money fled to easier bets.

Marine biologists had tried to sound alarm bells about what tidal barrages did to fish, sediment, and estuarine ecosystems. The structures blocked migration routes and altered tidal flows in ways that damaged fish nursery grounds. But cost alone would have killed tidal energy; environmental damage just made the corpse stink worse.

Even where costs stayed low, the grid could not absorb predictable tidal power at scale. Modern electricity networks built themselves around fossil fuels and solar, with storage and backup systems that did not fit tidal's rhythm. Operators needed the power when the sun set or the wind died, not when the moon pulled hardest. Pumped hydro storage could help, but that required building massive reservoirs, adding cost on top of cost.

The technology did not fail because it was bad. It failed because it was slow and rigid while the market moved fast and fluid. Solar and wind scaled globally with a lightness that tidal barrages could never match. Engineers still publish papers about tidal energy, and coastal towns still dream of harnessing their waters. Dreams stay cheap. Building stays expensive.


Published September 30, 2025 · Frisian News