Breaking
191 Murders, 190 of Them Children: Kenya Cult Leader Paul Mackenzie Convicted✦17.8% of UC Freshmen Fail Intro Math, Double the Rate Since SAT Was Dropped✦€32 Million a Year: Spain Quadruples Union Subsidies as Membership Hits Record Low✦32% Fewer Irregular EU Crossings as Central Mediterranean Collapses✦€1.13 Million in Ministry Grants, Then the CEO Role: Germany's Revolving Door✦Italy: Boy of 13 Sets Sleeping Man Alight and Cannot Be Prosecuted✦191 Murders, 190 of Them Children: Kenya Cult Leader Paul Mackenzie Convicted✦17.8% of UC Freshmen Fail Intro Math, Double the Rate Since SAT Was Dropped✦€32 Million a Year: Spain Quadruples Union Subsidies as Membership Hits Record Low✦32% Fewer Irregular EU Crossings as Central Mediterranean Collapses✦€1.13 Million in Ministry Grants, Then the CEO Role: Germany's Revolving Door✦Italy: Boy of 13 Sets Sleeping Man Alight and Cannot Be Prosecuted✦
Wednesday, 21 October 2026Est. 2026

FRISIAN NEWS

The numbers behind the news

English · Frysk · Nederlands

The Untold Story of How Oil Companies Shaped Climate Science
Environment

The Untold Story of How Oil Companies Shaped Climate Science

April 10, 2025 · Frisian News

Internal documents from major oil corporations reveal they funded research that muddied climate findings for decades, even as their own scientists confirmed warming risks. The industry's strategy worked: it delayed serious policy action until the 2000s.

English

In 1978, scientists at Exxon's research lab in New Jersey ran a computer model that showed carbon dioxide from burning oil would warm the planet by two degrees within a century. The finding alarmed the company's leadership. Rather than act on it, Exxon buried the work and funded a network of think tanks and researchers to question the science for the next forty years. Documents uncovered by investigative reporters show the company knew the risk was real, yet spent millions to make the public doubt it.

Shell, Chevron, and BP followed the same playbook. They hired scientists, yes, but they also hired public relations firms to amplify uncertainty. These firms did not deny warming outright, which would have looked foolish by the 1990s. Instead, they sowed doubt about the speed of change, the human role in it, and the cost of fixing it. Trade groups like the American Petroleum Institute ran advertising campaigns that posed the warming question as unsettled science, even after major national academies had reached consensus.

The strategy worked precisely because it did not need to convince most people. It only had to delay action long enough for the industry to extract and sell more oil. Governments hesitated to impose carbon taxes or emissions limits. International climate treaties stalled. Meanwhile, atmospheric CO2 climbed steadily, reaching around 420 parts per million by 2023. The industry's own timelines proved more profitable than the planet's.

Why does this matter now? Because many of the same companies still wield influence over energy policy in democracies across Europe and North America. They sit on government advisory boards, fund academic research, and lobby against regulations that would phase out fossil fuels. Transparency about past deception does not automatically stop present-day manipulation, but it should sharpen public skepticism toward what these firms claim they want to do about climate.

The oil industry proved long ago that money talks louder than science in democratic institutions. Today, citizens and lawmakers who want genuine climate action should remember that lesson. Trust the data, not the promises of companies that spent four decades trying to hide it.


Published April 10, 2025 · Frisian News