Breaking
191 Murders, 190 of Them Children: Kenya Cult Leader Paul Mackenzie Convicted✦17.8% of UC Freshmen Fail Intro Math, Double the Rate Since SAT Was Dropped✦€32 Million a Year: Spain Quadruples Union Subsidies as Membership Hits Record Low✦32% Fewer Irregular EU Crossings as Central Mediterranean Collapses✦€1.13 Million in Ministry Grants, Then the CEO Role: Germany's Revolving Door✦Italy: Boy of 13 Sets Sleeping Man Alight and Cannot Be Prosecuted✦191 Murders, 190 of Them Children: Kenya Cult Leader Paul Mackenzie Convicted✦17.8% of UC Freshmen Fail Intro Math, Double the Rate Since SAT Was Dropped✦€32 Million a Year: Spain Quadruples Union Subsidies as Membership Hits Record Low✦32% Fewer Irregular EU Crossings as Central Mediterranean Collapses✦€1.13 Million in Ministry Grants, Then the CEO Role: Germany's Revolving Door✦Italy: Boy of 13 Sets Sleeping Man Alight and Cannot Be Prosecuted✦
Wednesday, 21 October 2026Est. 2026

FRISIAN NEWS

The numbers behind the news

English · Frysk · Nederlands

How Welfare Programs Create the Poverty Traps They Are Supposed to Fix
Economy

How Welfare Programs Create the Poverty Traps They Are Supposed to Fix

August 4, 2026 · Frisian News

Welfare benefits that vanish above income thresholds trap low-wage workers in poverty by creating effective tax rates exceeding 100 percent. A mother taking a promotion ends up poorer, and this perverse outcome is built into the system itself.

English

A mother loses more in annual benefits than a promotion pays her in extra wages. She works harder and ends up poorer. This is not a glitch in America's welfare system. It is the system working as designed.

Economists call it the benefits cliff. When means-tested programs vanish above certain income thresholds, low-wage workers face marginal effective tax rates that would bankrupt a corporation. A single mother earning 20,000 dollars might owe federal income tax, payroll tax, and lose Child Tax Credit, Medicaid, housing vouchers, and SNAP benefits. Her true tax rate on each additional dollar can exceed 100 percent. The system punishes work.

This is by design, not accident. Welfare programs target money to the poor through income limits. The tighter the targeting, the steeper the cliff. Politicians embrace this because it saves money and avoids helping anyone above the poverty line, a line drawn arbitrarily in Washington. What they ignore is that the poorest people rationally respond to incentives. Why work harder if work makes you worse off?

Germany's Hartz IV system produces identical results. Recipients caught in the trap stop seeking promotion or additional hours. Some leave the workforce entirely. The system achieves its goal of saving government money while worsening the very poverty it claims to fix. A guaranteed income paid without means testing would cost more upfront but eliminate these perverse incentives. The poor would gain without losing.

No mainstream party will propose this. Means testing appeals across the spectrum: liberals like targeting limited funds, conservatives like restricting access. Both protect a system that traps millions in the very poverty it purports to address. The poor are not stupid. They see the math. We should ask why we keep designing systems that punish them for trying to escape.


Published August 4, 2026 · Frisian News