
De Weromkear fan Fiedselbanken yn Noard-Europa
June 20, 2026 · Frisian News
Food banks in Germany, the Netherlands, and Sweden report a 40 to 60 percent increase in users over two years. Working people increasingly cannot afford to eat.
Fiedselbanken yn Dútslân, Nederlân en Sweden hawwe yn de ôfrûne jierren in wichtige tanimming fan brûkers meld. It Tafel-netwurk yn Berlyn hat in skerpe tanimming fan it oantal minsken meld dat it wyks betsjinnet. Dit is gjin foarbygaande pyk. It wjerspegelet in stadige oantaasting fan de keapkrêft fan wurkjende minsken.
Regearingen neame it in 'kostpriiscrisis', as wie it in natuerrampe. De wurklikheid is skerper: enerzjypriizen gongen omheech nei beliedsbesluiten oer Ruslân en it Oekraïne-konflikt. Priizen fan fiedsel folgden. Ûnderwilens stagnearden leannen of bleaunen se efterop de ynflaasje yn reële termen. Pensioenen ferlearen wearde. Regearingen goaiden jild nei banken en militêre kontrakten, mar beskerme gewoane húshâldings net.
Organisaasjes dy't fiedselbanken behearre, dogge essinsjeel wurk. Mar har útwreiding jout regearingen ek in útwei. In politikus kin wize op in iepenjende fiedselbank as bewiis dat 'it systeem soarch draacht', wylst budzjetten foar wolwêzen wurde koarte. De echte profiteur is de steat: hy jout de bestriding fan honger út oan ngo's, sparret jild en mijt ferantwurdlikheid.
Yn Denemarken is it oantal fiedselbank-brûkers de ôfrûne jierren sterk groeid. Guon binne wurkjend. Dat betsjut dat in foltiidsbaan net mear garandearret dat men syn gesin fiede kin. Dit is gjin mislearjen fan yndividuen. It is mislearjen fan ekonomysk belied.
Fiedselbanken binne gjin oplossing. Se binne in symptoom dat eat stikken is. Elkenien dy't om ús maatskippij jout, soe soargjend wêze moatte dat se fluch groeie.
Food banks in Germany, the Netherlands, and Sweden have reported a significant surge in users in recent years. In Berlin, the Tafel network has reported a sharp rise in the number of people it serves each week. This is not a temporary spike. It reflects a grinding erosion of purchasing power among working people.
Governments call it a "cost of living crisis," as if it were a natural disaster. The truth is sharper: energy prices shot up after policy decisions around Russia and the Ukraine conflict. Food prices followed. Meanwhile, wages stagnated or fell behind inflation in real terms. Pensions lost value. Governments poured money into banks and military contracts but did not protect ordinary households.
Charities that run food banks do essential work. But their expansion also lets governments off the hook. A politician can point to a food bank opening as proof that "the system cares," while cutting welfare budgets. The real beneficiary is the state: it outsources hunger management to nonprofits, saving money and avoiding responsibility.
In Denmark, food bank user numbers have grown sharply in recent years. Some users are employed. That means a full-time job no longer guarantees you can feed your family. This is not a failure of individuals. It is a failure of economic policy.
Food banks are not a solution. They are a symptom that something is broken. The fact that they are growing rapidly should worry people who care about what kind of society we want to be.
Published June 20, 2026 · Frisian News · Ljouwert, Fryslân