Breaking
191 Murders, 190 of Them Children: Kenya Cult Leader Paul Mackenzie Convicted✦17.8% of UC Freshmen Fail Intro Math, Double the Rate Since SAT Was Dropped✦€32 Million a Year: Spain Quadruples Union Subsidies as Membership Hits Record Low✦32% Fewer Irregular EU Crossings as Central Mediterranean Collapses✦€1.13 Million in Ministry Grants, Then the CEO Role: Germany's Revolving Door✦Italy: Boy of 13 Sets Sleeping Man Alight and Cannot Be Prosecuted✦191 Murders, 190 of Them Children: Kenya Cult Leader Paul Mackenzie Convicted✦17.8% of UC Freshmen Fail Intro Math, Double the Rate Since SAT Was Dropped✦€32 Million a Year: Spain Quadruples Union Subsidies as Membership Hits Record Low✦32% Fewer Irregular EU Crossings as Central Mediterranean Collapses✦€1.13 Million in Ministry Grants, Then the CEO Role: Germany's Revolving Door✦Italy: Boy of 13 Sets Sleeping Man Alight and Cannot Be Prosecuted✦
Wednesday, 21 October 2026Est. 2026

FRISIAN NEWS

The numbers behind the news

English · Frysk · Nederlands

Why Proportional Representation Does Not Deliver Stable Government
Politics

Why Proportional Representation Does Not Deliver Stable Government

June 29, 2026 · Frisian News

Proportional representation promised to include diverse voices in government. Instead, it produces weak coalitions held hostage by small parties, endless coalition talks, and rapid government collapses.

English

Belgium spent over 18 months in coalition negotiations after its 2010 proportional elections. The Netherlands watches coalitions collapse regularly within two years. Italy and Spain face repeated government dissolutions and new elections. These are not edge cases but the normal cost of pure proportional systems. When parliament reflects every faction equally, no coalition commands authority.

Proportional representation assumes that including every voice creates stability. It fragments power instead. With a dozen parties holding seats, no majority exists automatically. They must build coalitions from scratch, and the smallest parties gain outsized power. A party with five percent winning two or three seats becomes essential to any government. That party demands concessions worth far more than its popular support. Infrastructure money for one region. Tax breaks for a narrow interest. Cabinet positions. The math is brutal.

Meanwhile, large parties that won 25 or 30 percent of the vote must accept humiliation. They beg small parties to join them. They accept policies they oppose because refusing means no government at all. The public voted for one direction. The coalition agreement ends up pointing somewhere else entirely. Small parties celebrate their victories. Large parties and voters lose faith in the system.

Once formed, these coalitions are fragile. A scandal topples one party. A policy dispute escalates and the coalition fractures. The government falls. New negotiations begin. Years pass in coalition talks. Countries with PR systems spend vast portions of their calendar in government formation, not governance. Meanwhile, the machinery of state grinds slowly or stops.

Proportional representation promised voters something that never arrived. It delivers representation without power, inclusion without governance, and the will of minorities over majorities. The voter learned this the hard way. So did every nation discovering it.


Published June 29, 2026 · Frisian News